Steam pump: 1698-1702
|
Thomas Savery has grown up in a mining district of Devon and knows
the problem of flooded mines. In 1698 he obtains a patent for an engine
to raise water 'by the Impellent Force of Fire'. It turns out to be the
world's first practical steam engine. Designed purely as a pump, it has
no piston but relies on the power of a vacuum.
A metal cylinder
is filled with steam from a boiler. Cold water is poured over the
outside, condensing the steam within and creating a vacuum which sucks
water up through a pipe at the base. When the cylinder is full of water,
the valve from below is closed. Steam is again introduced, forcing the
water out of the cylinder through another valve. With the cylinder again
full of steam, the process is repeated.
|
|
|
|
In 1702 Savery publishes a book about his invention, entitled The Miner's Friend.
In it he describes how the idea came to him. One evening, after
finishing his wine, he threw the empty bottle into the fire and prepared
to wash his hands in a basin of water. Noticing steam coming out of the
neck of the bottle, he plucked it from the fire and stuck it neck down
in the basin. As the bottle cooled, it sucked up the water.
The story sounds improbable, and it may be Savery's
way of trying to justify his patent - for the principles involved are
already well known to contemporary scientists. What the pamphlet does
show is that Savery intends to make money from his invention by
supplying pumps to mines.
|
|
|
|
As it turns out, the maximum levels of pressure and vacuum achieved
by Savery cannot lift water more than about twelve yards - too little
for most mines.
Instead he finds his main customers among
progressive country landowners, who are attracted by being at the
cutting edge of technology. They use Savery's pumps to raise water for
their houses and gardens.
|
|
|
|
Boiler, cylinder and piston: 1704-1712
|
Two Devon metalworkers - Thomas Newcomen, a Dartmouth blacksmith,
and his assistant John Calley, a glassblower and plumber - are making
good progress in some potentially very profitable experiments. They know
the high cost of the horse-driven pumps which raise water from the
copper and tin mines of Devon and Cornwall. So they are working on a
steam pump.
Though probably unaware of this, they are combining two elements pioneered separately by Denis Papin and Thomas Savery - Papin's piston and Savery's separation of the boiler (providing the supply of steam) from the cylinder (where the steam does its work).
|
|
|
|
In Newcomen's engine the piston, emerging from the top of the
cylinder, is attached by an iron chain to one end of a beam which
seesaws on a central pivot. At the other end of the beam another chain
leads down to the water-pumping mechanism.
Steam
released from the boiler into the cylinder pushes up the piston. When
the cylinder is full of steam, the same procedure follows as in Savery's
engine. Cold water poured on the outside condenses the steam and
creates the vacuum. But in this case, instead of directly sucking up
water, the vacuum causes the piston to descend in the cylinder. The
chain drags down one end of the beam, activating the pump at the other
end.
|
|
|
|
As so often in the advance of science and technology, an accident
provides Newcomen with the refinement which brings his pump up to an
economic speed. A flaw develops in one of the seams of his cylinder. As a
result some cold water, intended only to flow down the outside, gets
into the cylinder when it is full of steam. It creates a vacuum so rapid
and so powerful that it snaps the chain attaching the piston to the
beam.
With this event another lasting feature of the steam
engine is discovered. In all Newcomen's developed engines, which soon
start work in England's mines, the steam is condensed by a jet of cold
water injected into the cylinder.
|
|
|
|
The first of Newcomen's working engines is installed in 1712 at a
colliery near Dudley Castle. It operates successfully here for some
thirty years, as the first of many in the mining districts of Britain.
Newcomen's machine undoubtedly infringes Savery's
patent, for there is no denying that it works 'by the Impellent Force
of Fire'. But Savery is having no great commercial success with his own
machine. The two men come to an amicable arrangement, the details of
which are not known.
Even with Newcomen's improvements, these
machines are suitable only for the slow relentless work of pumping in
the mines. Proof of the wider potential of the steam engine must await
the inventive genius of James Watt.
|
|
|
|
A millennium clock: 1746
|
In 1746 a French clockmaker, Monsieur Passemont (his first name is
not known), completes a clock which is almost certainly the first in the
world to be able to take account of a new millennium. Its dials can
reveal the date of the month in any year up to9999.
It is a longcase
clock, in an ornate baroque casing which conceals a mechanism
consisting of more than 1000 interconnecting wheels and cogs. Their
related movements, as they turn at their different speeds with each
swing of the pendulum, are designed to cope with the complexities of the
Julian calendar. Thus, for example, one large brass wheel has the responsibility of inserting February 29 in each leap year.
|
|
|
|
This particular wheel takes four years to complete a single
revolution. When it has come full circle, it pops in the extra day. (M.
Passemont decides, however, not to grapple with Gregorian refinements; the absence of February 29 in 1700, 1800 and 1900 has had to be manually achieved.)
Louis
XV buys the clock in 1749, three years after its completion. It is
still ticking away two and a half centuries later in the palace of Versailles.
The minutiae of daily time-keeping are also adjusted by hand (the clock
loses a minute a month), but Monsieur Passemont's masterpiece requires
no assistance in making a significant change in the first digit of its
year display - from 1 to 2, at midnight on 31 December 1999.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment